Americans Rarely Resign on Principle

Reluctance to resign when warranted is an important glitch in our national character. We usually define ourselves in relation to our work. When we first encounter another person, often the first or second question is what that person does for a living? In other countries, this question comes further along in the conversation or hardly at all and more often the questions revolve around family/clan or other community related issues. People in other cultures tend to consider their own personal worth and the respect they have for their family and community to be an important factor in deciding whether an ethical situation at work would jeopardize that respect. We, in contrast, tend to think of the job as defining our personal worth, while in other countries it is more how one another relate to family and position in society. Shaming one’s name, one’s family, etc. is more important in other cultures.

Another factor in the difference is the social safety net. Most developed economies have greater socialized support systems. In the US., there is less of a concept of a safety net. Individuals here are conditioned to fear losing their jobs. When one loses a job, one feels that one loses respect, but also one loses the few benefits (such as health insurance) that come with employment. This is a weapon employers use to discourage workers from changing jobs.

One suggestion to improve this issue is universal health care. If we had an adequate health safety net, it would help individuals when they consider moving on from challenging job situations. Of course, it would be even better if the safety net would be even better, but at least with universal health care individuals could be secure in knowing that at least during any period of job transition, the bottom would never completely fall out.

An observation about the “Great Resignation”: Pundits have puzzled over why millions are not returning to work after the COVID economic downturn, especially to full-time work. Many Americans are voting with their feet. They are reevaluating their relation to work and searching to re-balance their life. If employers want to preserve as many workers as they can, they should consider four-day work weeks, more flexible hours, work at home, etc.

This video speaks volumes on the serious political consequences of people not sticking to their principles and remaining in office (!coarse language):

Anti-Trump Republicans, this is your fault, too

Pandemic

Why do we keep on keeping on
In the face of such disaster
when health policy is no good for no reason
when everything supposed to be right is wrong
when the CDC says something
and the FDA says something
and somebody remarking on public confidence
says something
and the public won’t wear the masks?

What keeps frontline workers working into the night
and keeps them going in the morning
living on coffee and waiting for things to end
cleaning counters and wiping vegetables
as if some answer lay in a disinfectant
and despite those among us who
irrationally and without a doubt
are leaving their trust in
Tucker Carlson and hydroxychloroquine?

Why don’t we say just screw it
And stop trying again and again
to march into the President’s pressroom
with half an idea about the Wuhan virus
hoping he’ll have the other half
and hoping what he says will happen
when his stable genius
gets lit by something never tried
and he states will work this time?

Could it be it,
that we do all this over and over
just for those times
when a revelation may rise among us
like something ever re-birthing
a new life, another hope
something not immediately visible but
leading us to a real solution
and the salvation of the human race?

© 2020, Kenneth Koziol. All rights reserved.

Message to Sen. John McCain on the ACA

July 25, 2017

Although I am a very Blue democrat who often stridently disagrees with many of your positions, I have always retained a deep affection for you and your experience. I also commend your staff. For while we may disagree on direction, I know that you and your staff work very hard for the state of Arizona and the country. In early Fall 2007, I extended an invitation to you and your wife to share a dinner with us at our modest Bay Area home to obtain a more personal impression of your views on a number of national issues. Perhaps if you had followed up on my invitation, a different portrait may now be hanging at an address on Pennsylvania Avenue.

It is difficult for me to understand your position on the ACA. There have been several flip-flops over your political career. The latest major flip-flop is your decision to vote ‘yes’ to carry on debate over the ACA. You know continuing to oppose the ACA will severely affect the lives of millions of you fellow citizens. You claimed that you wanted a return to “regular” order, but this “yes” vote means just the opposite. Healthcare for millions is complicated and requires careful discussion and analysis. For a short example, there is no discussion on how to reign in soaring health delivery costs when healthcare executives are seeing record salaries. What exactly did your sacrifice in Vietnam mean that you would instill pain upon your fellow citizens? Arguments about the burden of the individual mandate are really superficial – the burden of some hundreds or even thousands of extra dollars a year versus the tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands medical procedures cost. A single IVIG treatment can cost $20,000. Your recent surgery, if paid out without adequate insurance, would soon bankrupt most families. Please be a patriot again. Finish on the top side, the good side, of your legacy.

© 2017, Kenneth Koziol. All rights reserved.